

Overview
Ben Horwich focuses his legal practice on complex litigation and appeals, advising clients at the intersection of law, regulatory authority and public policy.
He is ranked by Chambers USA as one of the leading appellate lawyers both in the United States and in California. He has notable expertise in antitrust and competition law, class actions and federal preemption under numerous regulatory schemes.
Ben offers clients valuable foresight and strategic insight in confronting complex, novel and industry-defining legal issues, and he advocates on their behalf to shape legal outcomes at the frontiers of legal and regulatory interpretation.
His substantial experience, including nearly a decade of service in the federal government, includes briefing and arguing cases before all levels of the federal courts and California state courts, including arguing 10 cases in the Supreme Court of the United States.
His industry experience includes agriculture, financial services, surface and air transportation, pharmaceuticals, medical devices and food production and marketing, gaming, entertainment, technology platforms, manufacturing, telecommunications, semiconductors and energy.
Capabilities
Practices
Experience
Appellate – Antitrust
American Express in a U.S. Supreme Court victory in a lawsuit brought by 17 states and the U.S. Department of Justice alleging that the credit card company’s merchant contracts were anti-competitive and violated federal antitrust laws.
BNSF Railway in more than 100 antitrust price-fixing cases consolidated before the D.C. federal district court in two multi-district proceedings. The plaintiffs, including some of the railroads’ largest customers, are seeking billions of dollars on behalf of the class.
Steves & Sons, in the first matter ever in which a jury, not a regulatory body, required divestiture as a remedy in private litigation over a completed merger.
Appellate – Financial Services
Wells Fargo Bank NA in the California Supreme Court, in a case establishing that lenders and loan services are not obligated to protect a borrower’s economic interests when processing a mortgage modification application.
Wells Fargo in resolving class action litigation after the city attorney for Los Angeles filed suit against Wells Fargo alleging that bankers were improperly opening accounts for customers. Plaintiffs alleged damages upwards of $1 billion, however the matter was settled for $142 million.
Wells Fargo Bank as lead counsel in a consumer class action and various other matters relating to allegedly improper sales practices.
Regulatory, Tax and Takings Litigation
Rail Transportation
BNSF Railway in obtaining a settlement with Navajo Transitional Energy Company’s Spring Creek Mine shortly after MTO briefed a Fifth Circuit appeal of an adverse decision from the Surface Transportation Board, which had ordered the carrier to handle 23 trains per month from the mine and meet a 4.2-million-ton annual quota. The matter was one of the most significant test cases involving the common carrier obligation in decades.
BNSF Railway in a Ninth Circuit victory establishing that the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995 (ICCTA) preempts local county permitting processes in the Columbia Gorge, despite the fact that such permitting occurs pursuant to an interstate compact.
A railroad trade association in representation before the Surface Transportation Board in proceedings related to reciprocal switching.
Property Tax Authority
AT&T, T-Mobile, Lumen Technologies and affiliates in seeking refunds of property taxes paid in California at rates higher than those applicable to locally assessed taxpayers. The utilities contend that California counties’ disparate taxation of utility property violates Article XIII, Section 19 of the California Constitution, which requires that utility property be taxed “to the same extent and in the same manner as other property.”
BNSF Railway in the successful appeal of BNSF Railway Co. v. County of Alameda et al. and BNSF Railway Co. v. County of San Diego et al., resulting in settlement and agreement to release tens of millions of dollars in tax refunds and credits to BNSF.
BNSF Railway in defeating the state of Oregon’s attempt to enormously increase BNSF Railway’s property tax burden, on the grounds that federal law prohibiting discriminatory taxation of railroads.
Water Rights
The six Irrigation Districts of the US Bureau of Reclamation Gila Project, in Yuma County, Arizona, regarding their continued rights to irrigation water taken from the Colorado River, which irrigates land that provides 90% of the nation’s winter vegetables. The districts’ water rights are competing with users in seven states and Mexico, including Indian Tribes, cities and other growers/ranchers regulated by the US Department of Interior and the Arizona Department of Water Resources.
Fifth Amendment – Takings and Just Compensation
Farmers and landowners in securing a major appellate victory in their effort to secure just compensation under the Fifth Amendment for the taking of their farmlands by recurring flooding along the Missouri River, which was caused by massive river alterations made by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Assistant to the Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice (2009-2014)
As an attorney for the United States, Ben filed nearly 200 briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court, and he advised the Solicitor General on more than 200 other matters pending in lower courts.
During his tenure in Washington, D.C., Ben had significant responsibility for almost every competition law matter requiring action by the Solicitor General. He worked closely with the Food and Drug Administration on matters implicating patent law, competition law, regulatory practice, tort law and federal preemption, and spanning nearly every category of product regulated by that agency. Ben also argued, briefed, or supervised the government’s participation in several key Supreme Court and lower court cases in rapidly evolving areas of class action practice and personal jurisdiction law.
More
- Chambers USA, Appellate Law, USA-Nationwide; Litigation: Appellate, California
- Ranking in The Legal 500 U.S. Guide, Appellate: Courts of Appeal and Appellate: Supreme Courts (States and Federal) categories, June 2024
- The Best Lawyers in America, 2024-2026
Publications
- Quoted, “High Court Creates Litigation Openings for Regulation Challenges,” Bloomberg Law, Nov. 25, 2024
Speaking Engagements
- Panelist, “Supreme Court: The Aftermath of Loper,” 44th Annual Ray Garrett Jr. Corporate & Securities Law Institute, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, Chicago, Sept. 26, 2024
News & Insights
Awards & Recognitions